top of page
Writer's pictureJurisview Journal

"The Value of Truth" Reality Show


Photo credits: Daily Mail


Author’s note: 


With the rise of social media in the past decade, sharing personal moments of one’s life for the world to see has become increasingly normalized. It is commonplace to see users sharing their phone number, location, and full name on said platforms. This has become so normalized that many have begun to neglect the danger that comes with oversharing. One instance of this took place on “The Value of Truth” reality show in which Ruth confessed to accepting money for sex on two different occasions. Later, she was found dead, with signs pointing to her being strangled. The revelation of many of her secrets not only led to damage to her public image but also affected someone so much that they chose to murder her. Thus, by learning about this case, it is paramount to realize the danger that comes with oversharing. 


----------------


A blinding spotlight flashes across Ruth’s face as she squints. Her heart is beating so quickly that she can practically feel it in her shaking fingers. 


This was meant to be fun, maybe slightly embarrassing, but not disastrously shameful and humiliating. Ruth questioned why she had ever even agreed to this. Her mother’s angered face worried her almost as much as the secrets she had already released to the world on this terrible game show. 


“Are you ready for the next question?” the host asked, his wide smile revealing shiny straight teeth that reflected the spotlight. With a heavy heart, Ruth nodded. What else could she possibly reveal? Shame flooded her veins. “Have you ever accepted money in exchange for sex?” 


It feels as though her heart has dropped to her feet. Her stomach churns. Tears gather in her eyes. Ruth glances at her mother, who is fuming, then her father, who looks tremendously disappointed, and then finally her boyfriend, Bryan Romero, who has a furious look in his eyes—a murderous glint. 


But there’s no escaping the inevitable humiliation and alienation. Her secrets were no longer hers. 


As she mutters the dreaded phrase “Yes,” the murderous glint in Romero’s eyes grows into a fury that Ruth would remember until her dying moments. 


Ruth Thalia Sayas Sanchez’s deceased body would be found over two months after her live confession. Evidence of poison and marks on her body would lead investigators to believe that she had been strangled to death by her boyfriend. 


According to police reports, Romero’s primary motive for allegedly killing Sanchez was that he felt entitled to the 15,000 soles—around $5,700—that she won on the show. 


Sanchez was the first contestant on the game show “The Value of Truth” in which contestants had to answer personal questions in front of an audience and their loved ones. Prior to appearing in front of a live audience, contestants were subjected to a polygraph test to verify their responses. 


The questions began tame, including “Have you ever skipped school without your mother’s knowledge” and “If you found 1,000 soles, would you return them?” As the show progressed, however, Sanchez was faced with much more intrusive inquiries, forcing her to reveal that she was only dating Romero until someone better came along and that she had accepted money for sex in the past. 


After answering those questions, Sanchez apologized to her parents and Romero and announced her decision to stop her participation after winning 15,000 soles. However, it seemed as though the damage had already been done—Romero’s face was unreadable and Sanchez felt the need to fall to her knees and beg her mother for forgiveness as the credits rolled. 


The effect that the revealed secrets had on Sanchez’s loved ones was long-lasting. Reportedly, her mother grew moody while her father grew distant. Sanchez received calls from distant family members saying they felt ashamed. She began to dread leaving the house and even confessed to her mother that she had considered suicide. Romero faced criticism, as well, being taunted by high school students and having to hide in a nearby store as a result. 


Romero’s public statements were contradictory. In some interviews, he admitted his love for Sanchez prior to the show. In others, he claimed that their entire relationship had been fabricated to split the winnings after the show aired. 


Eight weeks after the reality show debuted, Sanchez went missing. Despite begging Romero to return Sanchez, asking the producers of the show to spread the word of her disappearance, and asking the police for help, Sanchez’s parents were left to search for their daughter alone, unsupported. 


Eleven days after her disappearance, the body of a young woman was found in a well on land that belonged to Romero’s uncle. Ultimately, Romero confessed to the murder, explaining that he had choked Sanchez to death amidst a fight. He was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment. 


This case illustrates how oversharing through public statements can cause unforeseen disastrous consequences. Though Sanchez believed that appearing on the reality show would ultimately benefit her through increased wealth, her appearance soon became a grave mistake. 


Thus, the need for privacy rather than imprudently oversharing must be recognized in the age of social media and neglect of online safety. Privacy is invaluable and cannot be traded for wealth or fame. 


Works Cited

Alarcón, Daniel. “Ruth Thalía Sayas Sánchez, a teenager from the outskirts of Lima, Peru, became an overnight sensation on a hit television game show. Then, she disappeared.” The California Sunday Magazine, 5 October 2014, https://story.californiasunday.com/the-contestant/. Accessed 14 June 2024.

Moran, Lee. “Boyfriend drugged and then hanged his girlfriend after she confessed on live TV that she was a prostitute.” Daily Mail, 24 September 2012, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207956/TV-quiz-contestant-drugged-beaten-hanged-boyfriend-confessing-live-air-worked-seedy-nightclub-dancer-prostitute.html. Accessed 14 June 2024.

“Peru Reality TV Show Faces Criticism Over Contestant’s Murder.” Peruvian Times, 27 September 2012, https://www.peruviantimes.com/27/peru-reality-tv-show-faces-criticism-over-contestants-murder/17019/. Accessed 14 June 2024.

Shoichet, Catherine E., and Maria Elena Belaunde. “Peruvian reality show contestant slain after TV confession.” CNN, 25 September 2012, https://www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/americas/peru-reality-show-killing/index.html. Accessed 14 June 2024.

9 views0 comments

Commentaires


bottom of page